Post

Logan v. Country Oaks Partners

The court held that a health-care agent appointed under a California Advance Directive lacks authority to bind the principal to an arbitration agreement, that the agent's statutory power is confined to making health-care decisions and selecting a care facility under Probate Code §§ 4600-4805, and therefore affirmed the.

Case Brief Full Opinion

Date Filed: August 18, 2022
Case Name: Logan v. Country Oaks Partners
Case Number: B312967
Court: California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four

The court decides that a health‑care agent appointed under a California Advance Directive does not have authority to bind the principal to an arbitration agreement; the agent’s power is limited to making health‑care decisions and selecting a facility, not to execute optional arbitration contracts. Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of the nursing home’s petition to compel arbitration is affirmed. This holding narrows the scope of a health‑care agent’s authority under Probate Code §§\u202f4600‑4805, protecting incapacitated patients from being forced into arbitration through agents’ actions.


This case summary was prepared for educational purposes. For the authoritative version, please refer to the full opinion or the official California Courts website.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.